While i like the narration, and the information is somewhat correct. However the editing mostly in the early part throws me off as you use the hammer and sickle instead of the several tricolour designs that could be used instead.
Sources would have been appreciated and it makes me doubt exactly how much of your information is sourced with a critical mindset.
You use alot of quotes but again, no sources no nothing. Its hard to find the trustworthiness of these quotes.
Many times i dont know WHERE we are in the story so a timeline would be nice in the top, some sort of graphic would be amazing.
Things that i found quite annoying was that you tried to use the Russian spellings and pronounciations of words while. Struggling to not butcher the words.
Aswell as this the Duma which you called a "Parliament" where the wealthy were favoured.
You never mentioned the Okhrana but just the police whom are different entities.
You mention that "Bolshevism" and "Menshevism" beforre the 1903 congress which is also wrong. They only came to fruition after 1903.
at 06:13 you say "He" while never having mentioned who. Whom i believe you mean Karl Marx but lenin also preached the class struggle and suc
Very good video. Quality content. Keep it up!
Only feedback: Some parts felt redundants. The timelime advanced but we came back to the same event multiple times.
I understand wanting to finish the idea before starting a new one, but maybe finding a way to create a single conclusion.
It most hit me around 55:00 to 1:07:00. Repeated mentions of strokes, Lenin's letters, thoughts on Staline and his death. Advancing and coming back in the timeline.
A long-form documentary on The ENTIRE History of INDIA
(from Indus Valley to the modern republic)
It would fit perfectly with this channel’s style and would be incredibly valuable for a global audience.
Suggestions for the topic of the next video? Comment below if you have any ideas
We use cookies, device fingerprinting and cross-device tracking to personalise content, serve targeted advertising, and analyse how you use our site across your devices. By clicking Accept all you consent to the use of these tracking technologies. Your data may be used to build a profile of your interests and show you personalised ads on other sites.
Privacy policy
Comments (20)
Daily Junction discussion mixed with clearly attributed comments from the original video provider.
Join in — free. Comments on Daily Junction are for members, so real names stay rare and bots stay out.
One field. We email you a 6-digit code — no password needed. Your comment is kept while you do it.
Under 13? You’ll need a parent’s OK first — it takes them one click.
Sources would have been appreciated and it makes me doubt exactly how much of your information is sourced with a critical mindset.
You use alot of quotes but again, no sources no nothing. Its hard to find the trustworthiness of these quotes.
Many times i dont know WHERE we are in the story so a timeline would be nice in the top, some sort of graphic would be amazing.
Things that i found quite annoying was that you tried to use the Russian spellings and pronounciations of words while. Struggling to not butcher the words.
Aswell as this the Duma which you called a "Parliament" where the wealthy were favoured.
You never mentioned the Okhrana but just the police whom are different entities.
You mention that "Bolshevism" and "Menshevism" beforre the 1903 congress which is also wrong. They only came to fruition after 1903.
at 06:13 you say "He" while never having mentioned who. Whom i believe you mean Karl Marx but lenin also preached the class struggle and suc
Only feedback: Some parts felt redundants. The timelime advanced but we came back to the same event multiple times.
I understand wanting to finish the idea before starting a new one, but maybe finding a way to create a single conclusion.
It most hit me around 55:00 to 1:07:00. Repeated mentions of strokes, Lenin's letters, thoughts on Staline and his death. Advancing and coming back in the timeline.
Thanks
(from Indus Valley to the modern republic)
It would fit perfectly with this channel’s style and would be incredibly valuable for a global audience.