For weeks, Washington has been building up its forces in the Middle East - and now looks set to assemble more air power in the region than at any time since the 2003 invasion of Iraq. President Donald
It would be good if she could name the experts who said that Iran does not have the capability to destroy that armada including naming the weapon that is going to be used to stop hypersonic missiles that will be speeding towards theses warships.
It’s such a shame that with your budget, resources, crew, and all the possibilities you have, you once again end up producing such non-substantive, amateurish material.
Why don’t you hire, or at least invite, people who actually know what they’re talking about—military, political, and economic EXPERTS—instead of people who can barely repeat cheap cliché slogans and whose knowledge seems limited to newspaper headlines? There’s no deep analysis of potential outcomes and consequences for the people of Iran, for the region, or for the world—what it all could result in; what about the regime; what the “right thing to do” is—a valid question, as we clearly see a dilemma. But there’s none of that, and there’s also no technical or military knowledge at all (I mean… just listen to 4:38), which is crucial when we ask ourselves how the events could play out, what’s realistic, and what is not.
I’m sorry, but once again it was a total waste of time. It’s a real shame.
Could the killing of over 200 school children (some as young as 13) during the last month protests in Iran be a story? (it's confirmed by teacher's association in Iran)
We live in the friggin 21st century, yet politicians are still living like it's the Middle Ages. War, which is murder. Should never ever be a choice. When will we grow tfu?
Depends, how many more Epstien files will be released?
We use cookies, device fingerprinting and cross-device tracking to personalise content, serve targeted advertising, and analyse how you use our site across your devices. By clicking Accept all you consent to the use of these tracking technologies. Your data may be used to build a profile of your interests and show you personalised ads on other sites.
Privacy policy
Comments (20)
Daily Junction discussion mixed with clearly attributed comments from the original video provider.
Join in — free. Comments on Daily Junction are for members, so real names stay rare and bots stay out.
One field. We email you a 6-digit code — no password needed. Your comment is kept while you do it.
Under 13? You’ll need a parent’s OK first — it takes them one click.
Why don’t you hire, or at least invite, people who actually know what they’re talking about—military, political, and economic EXPERTS—instead of people who can barely repeat cheap cliché slogans and whose knowledge seems limited to newspaper headlines? There’s no deep analysis of potential outcomes and consequences for the people of Iran, for the region, or for the world—what it all could result in; what about the regime; what the “right thing to do” is—a valid question, as we clearly see a dilemma. But there’s none of that, and there’s also no technical or military knowledge at all (I mean… just listen to 4:38), which is crucial when we ask ourselves how the events could play out, what’s realistic, and what is not.
I’m sorry, but once again it was a total waste of time. It’s a real shame.
Gaz UK.
Expensive?
Yes, but still a distraction.