"Finding things that should not exist?" Discovery Science "discovers," it doesn't make pre-conceived assertions, and then present them to the populace as "Fact." Question: If the Webb Telescope is "looking back" in time, why, why, why are we "observationally" seeing "FULLY-FORMED" Galaxies, or this case, "a huge Wall of Galaxies?" Why are we "not" seeing all the "Pre-Galactic" Structures? Don't give me a "hypothesis," don't give me a "theory." What we are seeing is "observational." The answers must reflect the evidence, not speculations.
A structure so enormous that it challenges known physics makes the universe feel far less predictable than we once thought. James Webb keeps revealing objects that seem too early, too large, or too strange to fit neatly into our models, and that is what makes these discoveries so unsettling.
What are you trying to argue? That these structures are not in the physical universe, or that these break physics. Both together can't be true. They can break understanding of physics but they can't break physics. Still you are telling us what it should look like. Smooth, but not smooth? WTF?
What an incredible video, admin! 🌌 Telescopes like James Webb are truly challenging the limits of current physics. The details about the cosmological principle cracking at [01:18] and the theoretical 1.2 billion light-year structure limit at [20:06] blew my mind. The breakdown of the "Big Ring" megastructure defying theory at [21:00] left me speechless! 🤯 Captivating narration, deep scientific insights, and a meaningful message at [02:09:00] left a lasting impression. Thank you for such high-quality content! 👏🚀✨
I'm terrified that the ring of galaxies is orbiting a huge black hole
We use cookies, device fingerprinting and cross-device tracking to personalise content, serve targeted advertising, and analyse how you use our site across your devices. By clicking Accept all you consent to the use of these tracking technologies. Your data may be used to build a profile of your interests and show you personalised ads on other sites.
Privacy policy
Comments (20)
Daily Junction discussion mixed with clearly attributed comments from the original video provider.
Join in — free. Comments on Daily Junction are for members, so real names stay rare and bots stay out.
One field. We email you a 6-digit code — no password needed. Your comment is kept while you do it.
Under 13? You’ll need a parent’s OK first — it takes them one click.
I believe it is important to not neglect this fact .